Queenswoodz and Kingswoodz come up together constantly, and for good reason: both are EXSIM developments in Bukit Jalil, both sit close to LRT Awan Besar, and Queenswoodz is openly positioned as "Kingswoodz 2" — the follow-up project on a neighbouring plot. That makes them easy to confuse, but they are not the same product at the same price. Here is what the public numbers actually show, so you can judge for yourself rather than go on the name alone.
The quick comparison
| Kingswoodz | Queenswoodz | |
|---|---|---|
| Launch | Earlier phase | Later phase (Phase 2) |
| Scale | 1,558 units, 3 towers, 3.45 acres | About 1,004 units, 2 towers, 3.44 acres |
| Distance to LRT Awan Besar | About 500m, 3–5 min walk | About 900m, roughly 3 min via covered walkway |
| Unit sizes | From 474 sq ft | 807 to 1,410 sq ft |
| Starting price | From RM398,000 (public listings) | From RM723,300 |
| Price per sq ft | About RM682–949 (public listings) | About RM550–906 |
| Tenure | Leasehold | Leasehold |
| Completion | Q4 2028 (estimated) | 2029 Q3 (estimated) |
Kingswoodz figures above are from public listings and the developer's own marketing, not from Joey Ng Property Advisory's records, so treat them as indicative until you confirm with the current price list. Queenswoodz figures are from the Queenswoodz project page, sourced from official developer material.
Kingswoodz: smaller units, lower entry price, closer to the LRT
Kingswoodz is the larger of the two by unit count — 1,558 units across three towers — and its smallest layouts start at 474 sq ft, well below anything Queenswoodz offers. That makes the entry price lower in absolute terms, from around RM398,000 in public listings. It also sits slightly closer to LRT Awan Besar, about a 3 to 5-minute walk. If your budget is tight and you want the smallest possible unit in this specific pocket of Bukit Jalil, Kingswoodz is the one to look at first.
Queenswoodz: larger family layouts, a dual-key option, a later completion
Queenswoodz has no unit smaller than 807 sq ft, and its largest layout (1,410 sq ft) includes a dual-key configuration that Kingswoodz's line-up doesn't offer at the same scale. It's the newer, later-launched project of the two, with a correspondingly later completion date. The starting price is meaningfully higher than Kingswoodz's smallest units, but that's a function of unit size, not necessarily a straightforward "more expensive per square foot" story — the public PSF ranges for the two actually overlap. I go through Queenswoodz's five layouts individually in the Queenswoodz floor plan guide.
Why people compare them at all
Because they're genuinely comparable: same developer track record, same immediate neighbourhood, same LRT line, launched roughly one cycle apart. That's a useful comparison to make — Kingswoodz's actual resale and rental performance, once more of it is tenanted, is one of the better real-world guides to how Queenswoodz might perform later, since they share a tenant catchment. It's a weaker comparison if you only look at the headline unit-count or "2 towers vs 3 towers" figures without also comparing size, price and completion timeline side by side.
Which one actually fits you
If the smallest possible entry price and the closest walk to the LRT matter most, and a compact unit doesn't bother you, Kingswoodz is worth shortlisting. If you need a genuine 3 or 4-bedroom family layout, want the dual-key flexibility, and can wait an extra few months for completion, Queenswoodz fits better. Neither is simply "the better one" — they're sized for different buyers within the same few hundred metres. As with any pre-completion purchase, confirm the current price list, remaining stock and exact unit facing directly with the developer before committing to either.
